← Services

Systems integration

Integration is a supporting Stax capability that commonly appears during application takeover, modernization, and continued engineering—not Stax’s primary company identity.

Important systems often do not share the right data: accounting, ERP, WMS, ecommerce, shipping, marketplaces, vendor systems, customer systems, and APIs. When those pieces do not share data cleanly, people become the integration layer.

The integration design starts with the systems already running your operation—their APIs, data contracts, failure modes, and continuity requirements. This is engineering work on real system seams—not generic n8n/Zapier-style automation positioning.

Typical work

  • API integrations
  • data synchronization
  • system-to-system workflows
  • migration planning and legacy data migration
  • automated imports and exports
  • middleware and reporting consolidation

Relevant work

Logistics · Active

Auction-to-shipment operations portal

Consolidated a fragmented auction-to-shipment workflow—including three clear-check providers, warehouse check-in, labeling, and outbound shipping—without pausing the operation.

  • 100K+ items
  • 10 operational roles
  • 12 manual tools replaced
Read the case →

When to start with a Groundwork Assessment

If the integration problem sits on top of poorly understood workflows or an inherited system, a Groundwork Assessment may be the right first step before wiring systems together. Related: operational software when a custom layer is part of the answer. For distribution and warehouse environments specifically, see distribution systems.

Questions buyers ask

What if one of our systems has a poor API?

Design around the real constraints—exports, batch jobs, middleware, or careful manual bridges—while protecting continuity and data integrity.

How do you prevent duplicate or inconsistent data?

By making ownership, sync direction, and failure modes explicit before building—and verifying behavior against real operational cases.

Can integrations land without replacing existing systems?

Often yes. The goal is usually to make current systems share the right work—not to rip everything out for a single platform.

Talk through the integration →

U.S.-based · Fully remote · Senior-led